Deep Hole Drilling of High-Performance Polymers (PEEK, PEKK, PTFE)
Guide to deep hole drilling of high-performance polymers — PEEK, PEKK, PTFE, and other engineering plastics. Material behavior, tool geometry, parameter optimization, coolant strategy, hole quality, and applications in medical, aerospace, and semiconductor manufacturing.
July 4, 2026 · Deep Hole Drilling Guide Team
Deep Hole Drilling of High-Performance Polymers (PEEK, PEKK, PTFE)
High-performance engineering polymers — PEEK (polyetheretherketone), PEKK (polyetherketoneketone), PTFE (polytetrafluoroethylene), and their reinforced variants — are increasingly specified in medical implants, aerospace components, and semiconductor equipment for their chemical resistance, high-temperature stability, and radiolucency.
Deep hole drilling of these materials presents challenges that are opposite to those of metals: low thermal conductivity traps heat in the polymer, elastic recovery can reduce hole diameter, and chip evacuation requires different tool geometry.
This guide covers material-specific drilling parameters, tooling requirements, and quality considerations for high-performance polymer deep hole drilling.
Material Characteristics
Polymer Types
Polymer
Max Service Temp
Tensile Strength
Modulus of Elasticity
Key Application
Drilling Difficulty
PEEK (unfilled)
250°C
90–100 MPa
3.6 GPa
Medical implants, aerospace
Moderate
PEEK (30% CF)
250°C
200–250 MPa
15–20 GPa
Aerospace structural
Moderate-difficult
PEKK
260°C
90–110 MPa
4.0 GPa
Aerospace, 3D printing
Moderate
PTFE
260°C
20–35 MPa
0.5 GPa
Seals, chemical equipment
Difficult (soft, deforms)
PPSU (polyphenylsulfone)
180°C
70–80 MPa
2.4 GPa
Medical, food processing
Moderate
POM (acetal)
100°C
60–70 MPa
2.8 GPa
General engineering
Easy
Key Properties Affecting Drilling
Property
PEEK
PTFE
Typical Metal (for comparison)
Impact on Drilling
Thermal conductivity
0.25 W/m·K
0.25 W/m·K
50 W/m·K
Heat stays at cutting zone — melts polymer
Coefficient of thermal expansion
47 × 10⁻⁶/K
120 × 10⁻⁶/K
11 × 10⁻⁶/K
Hole shrinks on cooling — oversize risk
Elastic recovery
5–10%
20–40%
< 0.1%
Hole diameter can be smaller than drill
Melting point
343°C
327°C
1,400°C
Thermal damage is melt/degrade, not burn
Glass transition (Tg)
143°C
130°C
N/A
Mechanical properties degrade above Tg
Abrasive fillers (CF/GF)
Yes (30% CF)
None
N/A
Rapid tool wear with reinforced grades
The Challenge of Drilling Polymers
Thermal Management
The most critical challenge — polymers conduct heat 200× less effectively than steel:
Problem
Cause
Consequence
Heat accumulation at cutting tip
Low thermal conductivity
Polymer melts or softens locally
Chip adhesion
Softened polymer sticks to tool
Chip packing, flute blockage
Re-solidified material on bore
Melted polymer re-solidifies on hole wall
Rough surface, dimensional inaccuracy
Dimensional change on cooling
High CTE + poor heat dissipation
Hole shrinks below target diameter
Chip Control
Polymer chips behave differently from metallic chips:
Material
Chip Type
Chip Control Strategy
Unfilled PEEK
Continuous, stringy ribbon
Sharp tool for chip breakage; peck cycles
CF-reinforced PEEK
Abrasive dust + short chips
Vacuum extraction; coolant flushing
PTFE
Gummy, continuous ribbon
Very sharp tool; high coolant flow
POM
Powdery, short chips
Easy — self-clearing
Tooling Selection
Cutting Tool Material
Tool Material
PEEK (unfilled)
PEEK (CF-reinforced)
PTFE
Best For
Uncoated carbide
✅ Excellent
✅ Good (fine grain)
✅ Excellent
General use
PCD
✅ Excellent
✅ Excellent
Not needed
High-volume CF-reinforced
Diamond-coated
✅ Excellent
✅ Excellent
Not needed
CF-reinforced, long runs
HSS
⚠️ Acceptable
❌ Not suitable
⚠️ Acceptable
Low-volume only
Recommendation: Uncoated fine-grain carbide for unfilled polymers. PCD or diamond-coated for carbon fiber-reinforced grades.
Tool Geometry
Geometry Feature
Metal Drilling
Polymer Drilling
Rationale
Point angle
118–140°
60–90°
Lower point angle reduces thrust — prevents part deflection
Rake angle
0–6°
10–20° positive
Positive rake shears polymer cleanly
Clearance angle
8–12°
12–20°
Higher clearance prevents rubbing and heat buildup
Edge preparation
0.02–0.05 mm hone
Sharp — no hone
Any edge radius increases cutting forces and heat
Coolant hole
Standard
Standard
Coolant is still needed for chip evacuation
Flute polish
Standard
High polish required
Reduces chip adhesion in flute
Tool Coatings
Coating
Purpose
Recommendation
Uncoated
—
✅ Best for unfilled polymers — sharpest edge
DLC (diamond-like carbon)
Reduces chip adhesion
✅ Recommended — prevents polymer sticktion
CrN
Moderate release
⚠️ Acceptable
TiAlN
Thermal barrier
❌ Not needed — polymers don’t generate metal-level heat
Parameter Guidelines
Speed and Feed
Material
Cutting Speed (m/min)
Feed Rate (mm/rev)
Coolant Pressure
PEEK (unfilled)
80–200
0.02–0.10
30–60 bar
PEEK (30% CF)
60–150
0.02–0.08
40–80 bar
PEKK
80–180
0.02–0.08
30–60 bar
PTFE
50–150
0.02–0.15
20–40 bar
PPSU
80–180
0.02–0.10
30–60 bar
POM (acetal)
100–250
0.03–0.15
20–50 bar
Starting parameters (PEEK, Ø6 mm gun drill):
Speed: 120 m/min (6,400 RPM)
Feed: 0.05 mm/rev
Coolant: Water-based emulsion at 40 bar
Peck Cycle Recommendations
L/D Ratio
Peck Depth
Retract
Purpose
< 20:1
Full depth
—
—
20:1–50:1
10–15× diameter
10–20 mm
Chip clearance + heat dissipation
50:1–100:1
5–10× diameter
20–30 mm
Prevent melting at depth
> 100:1
3–5× diameter
30–50 mm
Extended cooling time needed
Coolant Strategy
Coolant Selection
Coolant Type
PEEK (unfilled)
PEEK (CF)
PTFE
Recommendation
Water-based emulsion
✅ Good
✅ Good
✅ Good
Best for most polymer drilling
Compressed air only
⚠️ Short holes only
⚠️ Short holes only
⚠️ Short holes only
Risk of melting at depth
Neat oil
❌ Avoid
❌ Avoid
❌ Avoid
Can attack some polymers
No coolant
❌ Not recommended
❌ Not recommended
❌ Not recommended
Heat accumulation melts polymer
Note: Verify coolant compatibility with the specific polymer grade — some polymers absorb water (hygroscopic) or react with coolant additives.
PTFE presents unique challenges due to its extreme softness and high elasticity:
Parameter
PTFE Recommendation
Why
Drill oversize
+0.05 to +0.15 mm
Elastic recovery: PTFE can recover 20–40%
Feed rate
0.05–0.15 mm/rev
High feed reduces time for elastic deformation
Speed
50–150 m/min
Moderate to prevent frictional heat
Tool sharpness
Extremely sharp
Dull tool deforms PTFE rather than cutting
Coolant
Water-based or air blast
Flood is ideal; air acceptable for shallow holes
CF-Reinforced PEEK Drilling
Carbon fiber reinforcement introduces abrasive wear and fiber protrusion issues:
Parameter
CF-PEEK Recommendation
Why
Tool material
PCD or diamond-coated carbide
CF is highly abrasive
Tool life factor
1/3 to 1/2 of unfilled PEEK
Abrasive wear shortens tool life
Speed reduction
20–30% below unfilled PEEK
Reduces heat and fiber damage
Feed adjustment
Similar to unfilled PEEK
Feed has less effect on fiber damage than speed
Applications Requiring Deep Hole Drilling
Component
Material
Typical Hole Spec
Industry
Interference screw (ACL reconstruction)
PEEK
Ø2.0–4.5 mm × 20–40 mm
Medical
Spinal cage
PEEK
Ø3–6 mm × 15–30 mm
Medical
Aerospace bracket
PEEK (30% CF)
Ø4–12 mm × 30–100 mm
Aerospace
Chemical pump housing
PTFE
Ø6–20 mm × 50–150 mm
Chemical processing
Semiconductor wafer handling
PEEK
Ø3–10 mm × 50–200 mm
Semiconductor
Seal/gasket assembly
PTFE
Ø2–15 mm × 20–80 mm
General industrial
Summary
Deep hole drilling of high-performance polymers requires a fundamentally different approach than metal drilling: sharper tools with positive rake, lower point angles, and aggressive coolant to manage heat accumulation. Unfilled PEEK and PEKK drill well with sharp uncoated carbide tools at speeds of 80–200 m/min. Carbon fiber-reinforced grades require PCD or diamond-coated tooling due to abrasive wear. PTFE demands careful oversize compensation for elastic recovery. Liberal coolant use is essential — not primarily for lubrication, but to remove the heat that would otherwise melt the polymer and ruin the bore surface.